By Mareitje Schaake, First posted on: https://torrentfreak.com/we-need-copyright-reform-not-acta-120204, emphasis added by editor.
As a Member of the European Parliament, I very much welcome the
increased attention the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has
received in the past weeks. It has taken a while for massive outcry to
emerge, but we are seeing protest voices getting louder and louder.
The internet is a great tool to alert politicians to all the
dangers of this treaty, just as the internet was a tool to mobilize
people against the SOPA and PIPA bills in the US. For any lobby to be
effective, however, it must be fact based. Misinformed criticism helps
those supporting ACTA.
The dangers and threats of the ACTA treaty are shared by free-speech
advocates and access to medicine groups alike. ACTA is seeking to deal
with a number of widely differing issues, and hence does not do a good
job at any of them.
Additionally, there are serious concerns about the
collateral damage that ACTA would cause.
Regrettably, concerns by businesses, NGO’s and politicians have not
led to a better result. This is partly due to the intransparant way in
which ACTA has been established and negotiated. As a democratically
elected representative, I believe it is not the role of government to
protect outdated business models, and I do believe it is our job to
ensure democratic oversight.
Besides zooming in on the details of what ACTA will and will not do,
taking a step back and looking at the broader picture is also important.
As someone who advocates copyright reform, notably the harmonization of
copyright laws in Europe, I do not believe stricter enforcement of
outdated systems is helpful or relevant. Enforcement is not even possible in many cases, and not without violating people’s fundamental rights.
Yet there is a big push towards enforcing outdated legal structures
of copyright by the entertainment industry. ACTA will lock any signatory
country into a system of copyright enforcement, leaving the democratic
process disadvantaged to enact necessary reform of our laws to suit the
digital age.
The fast development of the information society and all the
innovations we have seen in the last 15 or so years have changed the way
we live. People can enforce their fundamental rights of access to
information, and free speech with the help of the internet. Human rights
violations are documented and shared across the world, and the way we
access and share information and culture such as news, music and films
has changed forever. Most copyright rules were developed for the
printing press and codified internationally before radio had even been
invented.
Some of the most important EU laws regulating the internet were
established before social media and peer-to-peer sharing took off. The E-commerce Directive of 2000 and the Copyright Directive
of 2001 were enacted without foresight of the new services which were
developed over the last 10 years. Time and time again, it has been
proven that the Directives and their national implementations do not
suit the digital age that followed directly afterwards. The
fragmentation of European copyright puts the EU, which is widely known
for its wealth in culture, at a competitive disadvantage in comparison
to the United States.
Copyright and E-Commerce need to suit the needs of the advanced
information society we now live in.
To enable a flourishing Digital
Single Market in Europe, we need to analyse case-law of the last 12
years regarding the internet, hear from creators, innovators and
consumers. If we want to serve consumers, artists and businesses well,
we need to find a new balance in copyright. Every aspect of copyright
needs to be discussed: the exclusive rights, limitations and exceptions,
collective management, enforcement, etc. Only then should we discuss
how to enforce the new found balance on the international arena, such as
with ACTA.
ACTA must not be passed. Let’s focus on reform to allow for the
opportunities of the internet to bloom, instead of allowing outdated
business models to limit the free market, and to criminalize audiences.
Additionally, health threats as a result of counterfeit medicine deserve
a better solution than ACTA. Join me in voicing your concern with this treaty, so we can establish flexible copyright rules which are fit for the 21st century.
No comments:
Post a Comment